Controlling Backbreak and Improving Technical and Economic Parameters in Mishdovan Iron Ore Mine

Document Type : Technical Note

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Dept. of Mining Engineering, Technical Faculties, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 M.Sc Student, Dept. of Mining Engineering, Technical Faculties, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mining Engineering, University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

One of the major problems related to blasting operations in open-pit mines is the formation of cracks on the benches behind the last row of blast holes or back breakes. Power Deck blasting has been introduced as a new and alternative method for conventional blasting, which improves blasting results by explosive energy utilization enhancement. In this technique, there is an air deck at the end of the blasting hole which decreases or eliminates sub-drilling. Power Deck blasting reduces charge per delay in the same conditions as conventional blasting and charge per delay is one of the most effective parameters of back break. In this study, back break caused by conventional and Power Deck blasting was evaluated in the Mishdovan iron ore mine. Back break in Power Deck blasting was reduced by 16.4% and 55% in iron ore and stone waste respectively as compared to back break in conventional blasting. Power Deck blasting could therefore be effectively used as a controlled blasting technique to obtain stable faces. Also after loading and hauling the fragment size, it was found that both methods have no significant differences in flat floors. Eventually, the Power Deck method reduced powder factor and specific drilling by 28.5% and 9%, respectively. In addition, holes productivity improved by 9% in Power Deck blasting compared to conventional blasting.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Berta, G. (1990). “Explosive - an Engineering tool”. Italesplosivi, Milano.
  2. Jimeno, C. L., Jemino, E. L., and Carcedo, F. L. (1995). “Drilling and blasting of rocks”. CRC Press.
  3. Bauer, A. (1982). “Wall control blasting in open pits”. In Proceedings of the 14th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 3-10.
  4. Day, P. R., and Webster, W. K. (1981). “Controlled blasting to minimize overbreak with big boreholes underground”. CIL Inc. CIMM Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta.
  5. Holmberg, R., and Persson, P. A. (1978). “The Swedish approach to contour blasting”. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, 113-127.
  6. Hustrulid, W., and Lu, W. (2002). “Some general design concepts regarding the control of blast-induced damage during rock slope excavation”. Proceedings of 7th Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Beijing.
  7. Esmaeili, M., Osanloo, M., Rashidinejad, F., Bazzazi, A. A., and Taji, M. (2014). “Multiple regression, ANN and ANFIS models for prediction of backbreak in the open pit blasting”. Engineering with Computers, 30(4): 549-558.
  8. Melnikov, N. V., and Marchenko, L. N. (1970). “Effective methods of application of explosive energy in minning and construction”. 12th Symp on Dynamic Rock Mecanics, AIME, New York, 350-378.
  9. Chiappetta, R. F., and Mammele, M. E. (1987). “Analytical high-speed photography to evaluate air decks, stemming retention and gas confinement in presplitting, reclamation and gross motion applications”. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, USA, 257-301.
  10. Jhanwar, J. C., and Jethwa, J. L. (2000). “The use of air decks in production blasting in an open pit coal mine”. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 18(4): 269-287.
  11. Saharan, M. R., Sazid, M., and Singh, T. N. (2017). “Explosive Energy Utilization Enhancement with Air-Decking and Stemming Plug,‘SPARSH’”. In ISRM European Rock Mechanics Symposium-EUROCK 2017, International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.
  12. Correa, C. E. (2003). “Use of air-decks to reduce subdrillings in Escondida mine”. Fragblast, 7(2): 79-86
  13. Floyd, J. L. (2004). “A report on power deck optimization prepared by blast dynamics”. Inc.
  14. Moser, P., and Vargek, J. (2007). “Bottom-hole and multiple power deck-independent test”. Conference Proceedings, 205-216.
  15. Chiappetta, F. (2004). “New blasting technique to eliminate subgrade drilling, improve fragmentation, reduce explosive consumption and lower ground vibration”. Journal of Explosive Engineering, 21(1): 2-10.
  16. Askari Badoee, M. J., Ebrahimi Farsangi, M. A., Mansouri, H., and Mansour Panahi, A. M. (2018). “Application of Power Deck in wet condition, case study: Goharzamin iron ore mine”. Fragblast 12, Sweden.
  17. http://www.powerdecking.com.
  18. Fourney, W. L., Barker, D. B., and Holloway, D. C. (1981). “Model studies of explosive well stimulation techniques”. In International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 18(2): 113-127.
  19. Melnikov, N. V., Marchenko, L. N., Zharikov, I. F., and Seinov, N. P. (1980). “Blasting methods to improve rock fragmentation”. In Gasdynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, 1113-1127.
  20. Moxon, N. T., Mead, D., and Richardson, S. B. (1993). “Air-decked blasting techniques: some collaborative experiments”. Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A, Mining Industry, 102.
  21. Lu, W., and Hustrulid, W. (2003). “A further study on the mechanism of airdecking”. Fragblast, 7(4): 231-255.